Citibank and the City of Wuhan: Struggling on the Banks of the Yangtse
The smoggy, foggy and utterly disheveled metropolis of Wuhan, on the Yangtse River in Hubei Province, bears the historical distinction of locus of the river trade. [See photo I took in Wuhan that gives you an idea of the Wuhan version of a sunny day.]
Prior to the establishment of the P.R.C., the river trade consisted primarily of opium, bibles, more opium, tea, automobiles shipped up from Shanghai, coal, bibles, weapons and opium.
Aside from its typical central-China, second-tier lack of aesthetic appeal, Wuhan natives are delightfully spirited – indeed, noted within China for their revolutionary fervor – and, in my experience, fast friends. But fighters to a man.
So when, at a public forum, Citibank announced its intention to set up a bank — based in Wuhan but spanning the central region — in which it would hold a 20% interest, the less-than-a-mile-away thunderclap of response was heard all the way to Shanghai.
Complicating matters somewhat was the fact that, in the early years of the last century, Citibank’s predecessor built a magnificent branch, lording over the docks, as a testament to its preeminence in Wuhan business circles. That building remains. I touched it myself, inducing a frisson of electricity as it grounded my historiographically-charged body. [See photo.]
That predecessor, the National City Bank of New York, subject of at least one recent book of national significance and numerous articles, is accused of the theft of imperial and nationalist China’s asset reserves. Among other financially rapacious crimes. Alleged criminal activity, of course. [I am a lawyer, after all.] Demand was made upon Citibank to pay up for the alleged [I repeat] acts of an institution that was not only dissolved decades ago, but its assets nationalized.
Nationalized. Don’t you just love the subtle fragrance of that perfumed euphemism?
Of far greater significance is the state of Chinese banking institutions, such as the unalterably poor condition of the so-called “city banks ????????,” rogue kin to the disastrous city cooperatives???????and credit collectives ?????, mismanaged by the municipal governments that own and barely run them. [Shanghai being an exception, but only by a hare’s tail.]
Fearing the competition Citibank presents as it moves inland by virtue of the timetable specified by the WTO accords – well, intending to move inland and encountering resistance every step of the way — Hubei provincial banking administrators have spoken out. They don’t like the idea of a new bank, preferring a reorganization of their existing decrepit and debt-ridden system. Perhaps with the aide of a white knight like Citibank, although this remains unsaid.
But Hubei banking administrators are getting scant support, it appears from their own admission, from national banking regulators in Beijing, who haven’t even responded to their reorganization proposal. And Citibank looks to be favoring an end run up to Beijing for additional leverage on the province.
Read all about it! My rough translation of this recent article from 21????? follows.
Prelude to a Yangtse River Bank: Citibank’s Ten Billion Yuan Trick
Relevant Applications Not Received by Hubei Banking Administration
People in the Hubei Provincial Banking Administration have disclosed that the reorganization of existing city business banks would be more practical than the establishment of a new bank.
June 23, a.m, on site at the “China Creates” display at the Wuhan Science and Technology Event Center, Citibank’s rather bland display board attracts the attention of event goers.
The Citibank banner, no more than 200 characters long, displays to all their intentions toward the Central region. The bank proposes to inject 10 billion RMB (approx. US$1.25 billion) to create a national stock-issuing bank – Yangtse River Bank, 20% of which will be held by Citibank. It is well known that Hubei has for a long time wanted to create a regional business bank, but the fact that a foreign bank has thrown out a proposal has astonished the financial world. Everyone involved has kept their reactions to a low undertone. Hubei Provincial Banking Administration officials tell reporters that there is nothing to this at present. Citibank China regional public relations executives refuse to comment. Two roads present themselves: integrate the city business banks or to reorganize them entirely. Each presents difficulties.
Citibank’s Proposal
Recent reports suggest that Citibank has already begun to set up a bank in Wuhan by the name of the Yangtse River Bank (or Yangtse River Development Bank). Moreover, Citibank Group’s international executive Vice-President has said in a speech that the Yangtse River Bank will attract 10 billion RMB in capital obtained from international, Chinese and local sources, of which 2 billion RMB will come from the Citibank Group and the American Brysam Global Partners.
On the afternoon of June 25, a reporter telephoned Mao Zhi-hua, manager of public relations for the China region, to ask about the organization of the Yangtse River Bank. Mao said he would not comment at this time.
A source disclosed that no application for the organization of the Yangtse River Bank has to date been received by the Hubei Provincial Banking Administration, and that the proposal was still only an idea. A spokesman from the largest business bank in Hubei province – Wuhan Business Bank — said he had not heard about the organization of the Yangtse River Bank.
“Currently, there is nothing to this,” came the response on the afternoon of June 25 from the Hubei Provincial Banking Administration.
That spokesman said, “I think this issue should not be raised just now, because the People’s Congress and the Politburo have proposed similar ideas about the improvement of the Hubei banking system. In the past, the relevant departments looked into it and studied improvement of the financial system. But the financial system is a complex problem.”
??
The spokesman said that the establishment of new financial institutions was far more difficult than coming up with the idea to do so. From Citibank’s point of view, they can naturally express their own ideas on the subject, “ But this issue isn’t just about talking. Even though foreign banks think the Wuhan financial market is ripe for development, setting up a financial institution can lead to a series of problems, and whether the idea can be put into practice is awfully hard to say.”
Reorganization of the Old or Establishment of the New?
??
What differs in Citibank’s idea, in the eyes of local Wuhan scholars, is that the development of the Wuhan Business Bank would have stronger roots within the local region.
“Strengthening and expanding the Wuhan Business Bank, creating a stock-issuing bank that spans the region, is, I think, the most practical,” says Wuhan University Economic Study Center’s President, Ye Yong-gang.
Ye Yong-gang’s proposal is to first inject capital into the Wuhan Business Bank with a share issue, thereafter change the bank’s name, and finally to change the business model to operate regionally as a stock-issuing bank.
Song Qing-hua, professor at Southeast Financial Economy, Law and Politics University, Xinhua Finance and Insurance Study Center, believes that a regional stock-issuing bank with its main branch at Wuhan has two possibilities: reorganization or the establishment of a new bank.
Song Qing-hua tends toward reorganization. “China already has over 130 banks, not a few, and the crucial thing is to take these banks and create a real market presence, and to increase competitiveness. Since we’re talking about bank, it must have a certain size, and only in this way, can it create trust among people and be capable of meeting its competition.”
A spokesman for the Hubei Provincial Bank Administration said that the integration of the city business banks in Hubei would be more practicable than the establishment of a new bank. “We could take the Wuhan Business Bank and [those of other cities] and merge them.”
Wuhan Business Bank would naturally form the core. Established in the late 1990s, its registered capital is 568 million RMB, and the Wuhan City Economics Bureau holds 17.6%, as its largest shareholder.
??
“Creating a large Wuhan Business Bank would meet with very great obstacles, coming from those municipalities with their own city business banks,” says a source.
An administrator who knows Hubei finance says that the Hubei provincial government has wanted to merge and reorganize the city business banks and credit collectives, creating a big and strong “Yangtse River Development Bank.”
“But there’s some difficulty in doing this.”
The difficulty includes the fact that within Hubei, banks and credit collectives have developed unevenly, just as was the situation encountered when Jiangsu provincial banks were reorganized into the Jiangsu Bank. A source close to the Wuhan Business Bank disclosed that, in planning future development strategy, Wuhan Business Bank wanted to take off on its own and to launch an IPO. It was not willing to merge and reorganize with other banks in the province.
The Dream of a Regional Banking Center
During the “China Creates” event, Hubei Provincial Vice-Governor Li Chun Ming did not express an opinion as to Citibank’s plan.
Sources say that Citibank has raised the idea with Hubei provincial officials in the past. As to the establishment in Wuhan of a national stock-issuing bank, Hubei province and the city of Wuhan have many times submitted their applications to national administration, but have never received any response. “At this time, they purposefully maintain a low profile on this issue, and I guess they are worried that national administrators are taking a long time in the approval process.” ??
??
Wuhan has never stopped dreaming of the day when it would once again become a financial center. The most recent proposal for a regional bank was submitted at the 5th meeting of the 9th plenum of the 2007 Hubei Political Committee, when top officials suggested that “a regional development bank can only be established in Wuhan.”
Previously, at the 2004 national meetings, the former Wuhan City Political Committee Chairman Liu Shan-bi submitted a proposal in his capacity as a national official, entitled: “A proposal to speed up the development of a regional financial center, regarding establishment in Wuhan of the Hankow Development Bank,” ??
Liu Shan-bi believes that, a stock-issuing bank, rooted locally, serving the central region, and aiming at national service, is established in Wuhan, it would have a far reaching effect on curtailing the loss of capital away from the area, support the growth of the central region, stimulate production..etc. etc. etc.”
21?????? ?2007-06-26 16:18:30
??“????”?????????
???????????????
??
??????????????????????????????
??
?????????????????????????????????????????????
??6?23??????????????“???”????????????????????????
???????200???????????????????????????????100??????????????????———???????????20????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????
??
???????
???????????????????????????(??“??????”)????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????100??????????????Brysam???????????????????20???
??6?25???????????????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????“????”??????????????????????———????????????????????????????
??“????????”6?25??????????????????????????
????????“???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????”
???????????????????????????????????????????????“?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????”
??
?????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????
??“????????????????????????????????????????”?????????????????
???????????????????????????????????????????????
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
?????????????????“????130?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????”
??????????????????????????????????????????????“??????????????????????????????????????????”
?????????????????????????????90??????????5.68????????????17.6%????????
??“??????????????????????????????????????????????”?????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????“??????”(?)????????“???????”
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
??
??????????
????????????“???”????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????“???????????????????????????”
???????????????????????
????????????????????2007?????????????????????????“??????????????????”
?????2004????????????????????????????????????“????????????????????????????????”
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Comments are closed.